Royal Numerology Secrets

🔢 Want to Unlock the Secrets Hidden in Your Birth Numbers?
👉 Discover the numerology breakthrough that reveals your life path and destiny!
Get Your Personalized Numerology Message Now »

Sunday, April 12, 2020

Tarot Bytes Episode 167 – What to do when you don’t “like” what the Tarot is telling you

Tarot Bytes Episode 167 - What to do when you don’t “like” what the Tarot is telling you

Tarot Bytes: The Podcast

Bite-sized lessons for Tarot beginners
Created by Theresa Reed, The Tarot Lady

Welcome to Tarot Bytes – the tarot podcast for people who want to learn tarot…but don’t have all day. Short, bite-sized tarot lessons.

Episode 167 – What to do when you don’t “like” what the Tarot is telling you

It happens to all of us at one point or another…you get a reading but you don’t like what the tarot is telling you. It sucks when that happens. And sometimes, when it does, you’re tempted to ask the question again. 

I like to say that I’m not a fan of beating a dead tarot horse. Rather than asking the question again in order to get the answer you want, I’m sharing my favorite strategies in this episode! Strategies such as: sit with the answer, journal, get a second opinion, ask good follow-up questions, and more.

Grab your favorite deck, put in your earbuds, and dive in!

xo

Theresa

Subscribe in iTunes, Google Play or Stitcher – or use  the mighty fine podcast player below to listen to this track, yo:

© Theresa Reed | The Tarot Lady 2020

Check out all previous Tarot Bytes lessons here.

 

Sign up for my newsletter and get free bi-monthly content on tarot, astrology, and more.

I respect your email privacy

The post Tarot Bytes Episode 167 – What to do when you don’t “like” what the Tarot is telling you appeared first on The Tarot Lady.



* This article was originally published here

No comments:

Post a Comment

Numerology Horoscope Today, January 26, 2026: See What's In Store For You - News18

Numerology Horoscope Today, January 26, 2026: See What's In Store For You    News18 * This article was originally published here ...